Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Dreyfus

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 7, 1948No. Civ. 43-451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Motion by plaintiff pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for summary judgment with respect to the First and Third causes of action, and cross motion for summary judgment with respect to each of the three causes of action set forth in the complaint. Plaintiff concedes that defendants are entitled to summary judgment in the Second cause of action.

The action is by a stockholder of the Celenese Corporation of America [hereinafter referred to as the Corporation] suing on her own behalf and all other stockholders…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Palmer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  2. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Marcus v. OtisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Bershad v. Bernard P. McDonough & Cudahy Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API