Legal Opinion

Osban v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2019No. S-18-0137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[¶1] A jury convicted Joshua C. Osban of possession of methamphetamine. Mr. Osban appeals his conviction, arguing the State failed to bring him to trial within 180 days following his arraignment as required by Wyoming Rule of Criminal Procedure 48. He also claims the district court should have suppressed the methamphetamine found in a container inside his truck because the search of the container was unreasonable. We reverse.

ISSUES

[¶2] Mr. Osban raises two issues:

I. Whether Mr. Osban's right to a speedy trial under W.R.Cr.P. 48 was violated when his trial commenced 194 days after…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Whiteplume v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Elder v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Taylor v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. WyoLaw, LLC v. State of Wyoming, Office of the Attorney General, Consumer Protection UnitWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Boyd Van Fleet v. Marceline A. GuyetteWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Russell Fay Harrison v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Brendon A. Boyce v. Julie A. Jarvis, f/k/a Julie A. BoyceWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API