United States v. Ulloa-Osorio
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alfredo Ulloa-Osorio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ulloa-Osorio has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re-*143fleeted therein. Although counsel addresses the validity of Ulloa-Osorio’s appeal waiver, counsel does not discuss the district court’s compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. An…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Richard HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Eduardo Carreon-IbarraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Vicki Stark-FittsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020