Dorfman v. Jacobs

The judgment debtor appears specially for the purpose of moving to vacate the order directing his examination. The only point raised which merits discussion is that as the papers upon which the order was granted show that a previous order to examine the defendant had been signed, and as it does not appear that an order discontinuing the former proceeding had ever been entered, the present order was improperly granted.

The affidavit upon which this order was made states that a former order was applied for and signed but never served upon the judgment debtor and that the *593return day of that order…