Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Turley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 1989No. 16-85-10664; CA A46369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendants petition for review, and we treat their petition as one for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We grant the petition in order to clarify our former opinion, 95 Or App 316, 768 P2d 993 (1989), and adhere to it as clarified.

In our former opinion, we refused to consider the assignments of error concerning plaintiffs’ claim under the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (ORICO), ORS 166.715 to ORS 166.735, because the jury returned a larger verdict on an alternative claim for securities fraud than it did on the ORICO claim. Defendants argued that evidence that was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Capital & Securities, Inc. v. KnudsvigCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Morgan v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yamaha Store of Bend, Oregon, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API