Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Lehigh & Hudson River Railway Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 3, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Heard on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

I The object of the bill is to enforce a submission to arbitration followed by an award of the arbitrator. The subject-matter of the arbitration was the price which the defendant railway company should pay the complainant for two strips of land belonging to him, taken and used by the railway company, by complainant’s permission, for many years before the submission. The immediate relief sought is to enjoin proceedings taken after the award, by the railway company, under the statute, for the condemnation of the lands and the appointment of commissioners by a justice of the supreme…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells v. LaneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. Valentine v. ValentineNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  3. Davy's Executors v. FawSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  4. French v. . NewNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. French v. NewNew York Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anco Products Corp. v. TV Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
  3. Kaplan v. Bagrier, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API