Legal Opinion

Cantor v. National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

The plaintiff has recovered a verdict on a policy of insurance indemnifying him against loss by burglary and robbery. From the judgment in plaintiff’s favor and from certain orders denying a new trial the defendant has appealed.

The judgment could be affirmed if we were convinced that the plaintiff was actually robbed. At the time of the alleged robbery he was engaged in business on the second floor of the Seitz Building in the. city of Syracuse. This building is located in or near the principal business center of the city. The single room that plaintiff occupied was on the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garten v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Rosenberg v. People's Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Szpyrka v. International Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Commercial Casualty Ins. v. LloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Lagravinese v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API