Legal Opinion

Blain v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 2007No. Civil Action No. 06-1247PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

In moving to certify this product liability action against the manufacturer of the antidepressant drug Paxil ás a national class action, the plaintiffs seek to represent all persons whose children under age eighteen committed or attempted to commit suicide while using the drug. The gist of the plaintiffs’ claims is that despite its specific knowledge of Paxil’s association with the increased risk of suicidality in pediatric patients, the defendant GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) failed to warn doctors, the medical community and the *182public of this danger.1 The…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powers v. Lycoming EnginesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  4. Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Kallman v. AronchickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API