Blain v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SAVAGE, District Judge.
In moving to certify this product liability action against the manufacturer of the antidepressant drug Paxil ás a national class action, the plaintiffs seek to represent all persons whose children under age eighteen committed or attempted to commit suicide while using the drug. The gist of the plaintiffs’ claims is that despite its specific knowledge of Paxil’s association with the increased risk of suicidality in pediatric patients, the defendant GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) failed to warn doctors, the medical community and the *182public of this danger.1 The…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powers v. Lycoming EnginesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Kallman v. AronchickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.