Legal Opinion

Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Witman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 3, 1915No. 5820PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Affidavit of illegality; from municipal court of Macon — Judge Daly. June 6, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtEussell, C. J.

Frank Adam Electric Company instituted suit in the municipal court of the city of Macon upon certain promissory notes made by Witman & Mountford, a partnership composed of J. M. Witman and W. J. Mountford Jr., and indorsed by D. Witman. The petition prayed for process directed to Witman & Mountford and D. Witman. The process stated the case as “Frank Adam Electric Company v. Witman & Mountford.” In the body the process read: • “The defendant Witman & Mountford is hereby required personally or by attorney to be and appear, etc.” Copies of the petition and process were served on J. M. Witman,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neal-Millard Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. John Holland Gold Pen Co. v. Williams & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Matthews v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. KunesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Holloway v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Williams v. Atlanta National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Massey v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
  5. Davis v. Jeep CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API