Pierce v. Lowenthal
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This action upon a note, indorsed by appellant Charles Lowenthal, who will henceforth be mentioned as if the only appellant, was tried to the court without a jury, who found the facts in favor of respondent and entered judgment accordingly.
The facts are irreconcilably conflicting, but there is ample evidence in the record to support the findings made by the trial court.
From the evidence adduced by respondent, upon which the trial court found in his favor, the following appears:
At some time during 1926, respondent was in the restaurant business, with one Nesbit as copartner. During the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilkie v. ChandonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Kuhn v. GrollWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Donohoe Kelly Banking Co. v. Puget Sound Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. OutlerWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Warren v. Washington Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Copeland Planned Futures, Inc. v. ObenchainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Mallette v. Pohlman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- National State Bank v. Miles-Botts Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.