Legal Opinion

Woody v. Hinds

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1904No. 1,840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William ■Clancy, Judge. Action by George H. Woody against Thomas R, Hinds and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE' BRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was brought in pursuance of Section 2326 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S'. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1430], to determine an adverse claim to the Jennie M. quartz lode, situate in Silver Bow county. The adverse claim is-asserted by defendants under a location covering the same ground and called the “Rival lode.” The original complaint was held insufficient on general demurrer, but leave was granted to file an amended complaint. It is therein alleged that the plaintiff is the owner, in possession and entitled…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis R. R. v. OylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Clark v. Oregon Short Line R. R.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lehman v. SutterMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Keppler v. BeckerArizona Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Gluck v. Raesly, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API