State v. Curtis M. Isom

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG,

for the Court.

This case came before the Supreme Court on December 1, 2015, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The defendant, Curtis M. Isom (Isom or defendant), appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury trial of "one count of breaking and entering. Before this Court, the defendant argues that 'the trial justice erred in: (1) denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal; (2) limiting the scope of his cross-examination of the state’s fingerprint expert; and…