Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Aiden Mendenhall v. Michael Reese, et al.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 26, 2026No. 6:25-cv-02426Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON JEFFREY AIDEN MENDENHALL, Case No. 6:25-cv-02426-MTK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. MICHAEL REESE, et al., Defendants. KASUBHAI, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Jeffrey Aiden Mendenhall (“Plaintiff”) brings § 1983 claims for violation of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and state law claims against thirty-four individuals and John or Jane Does employed by the Oregon Department of Corrections ("Defendants"). Compl. ¶ I.B, 12. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed to provide him with adequate medical treatment after he was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.