Legal Opinion

Schertz v. First National Bank of Chester

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County' Court of Woodford County; the Hon. A. M. Cavar, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacey

This was an action of assumpsit commenced by the appellee against the appellant in the County Court of Woodford County, Illinois, and proceeded to trial before a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of $350, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

The appellee is a corporation duly incorporated under the United States Banking Act, in 1889. The appellant was a stockholder in the Husted Investment Company, a corporation under the laws of the State of Kansas, duly incorporated in 1888, owning three and one-half shares of its stock, of $100 each, and had been such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Flash v. ConnSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Wincock v. TurpinIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Howell v. A. Manglesdorf & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Patterson v. LyndeIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Schalucky v. FieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holmes & Bull Furniture Co. v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Tuttle v. National Bank of the Republic of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API