Legal Opinion

Dalton v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 23, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff and by his *1105father for expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a directed verdict. Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. A verdict may be directed only when the trial court “ would be required to set aside a contrary verdict for legal insufficiency of evidence”. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 457-a, subd. 1; Loewinthan V. Le Vine, 299 N. Y. 372; Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Gorp., 292 N. Y. 241.) According to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Loewinthan v. Le VineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Dawson v. Trustees of New York & Brooklyn BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Reschke v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Bacon v. Hudson & Manhattan RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baxter v. BaxterNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Radist v. ZidelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API