Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 7, 2024No. 5:22-cv-04035Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS PAUL D. RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-4035-DDC CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case requires the court to resolve two questions: Where does the buck stop? And was it bad enough? To start, there’s the buck. Plaintiff Paul D. Russell alleges that he experienced a hostile work environment and that his employer, the Army, is liable for it. Defendant, Christine E. Wormuth in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army, contends that the Army escapes liability under the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API