Legal Opinion

McCain v. Lybrand

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1984No. 82-282PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

In 1966, South Carolina enacted a statute that altered Edgefield County’s election practices but the statute was not submitted to federal officials for their approval as required by the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In 1971, the statute was amended, modifying the 1966 election practices, and state officials submitted the amendment to the Attorney General for his approval. In response to a request from the Attorney General, state officials provided him with additional documentation in support of their submission, including the 1966 statute. The Attorney General approved the submission, stating…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Mixon v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Holder v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Tanya Mixon, Denise Thomas, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. The State of Ohio and Michael White, Mayor of the City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Presley v. Etowah County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API