Legal Opinion

Courtney Stangl v. Bio-Medical Applications of New Jersey

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 10, 2026No. 2:25-cv-11035Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY COURTNEY STANGL, Civil Action No. 25-11035 (JXN)(LDW) Plaintiff, v. OPINION BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF NEW JERSEY, Defendant. NEALS, District Judge Before the Court is a motion by Defendant Bio-Medical Applications of New Jersey, Inc., improperly pled as “Fresenius Kidney Care” (“Defendant” or “Company”), to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Courtney Stangl’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint (“Compl.”) (Ex. A, ECF No. 1) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 10.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API