Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Polack

California Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1884No. 8819Published

APPEAL from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Most, if not all, of the questions involved in this appeal are substantially determined by the cases entitled Chapman v. Polack, 58 Cal. 553, United States v. Chapman, 5 Saw. 528, Fed. Cas. No. 14,785, and Polack v. Gurnee, No. 8229, 66 Cal. 266, 5 Pac. 229.

We do not find any denial of the averment of the cross-complaint to the effect that the Geyser springs and hotel improvements are located on the N. E. % of section 13. It was therefore an admitted fact in the case, and being so, there was no impropriety in adding to the description of the property in the judgment the words “the same being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polack v. GurneeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. United States v. ChapmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1879
  3. Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API