Dean v. Earle
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
Defendants have renewed their motion for summary judgment on the claims of Plaintiff, Craig Allen Dean, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. 1 Unquestionably, Plaintiff was unfairly imprisoned and prosecuted. Upon close inspection, the Court finds reason to believe that his Fourth Amendment protections were trampled upon as well. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants’ motion is denied, with the exception that the claims against Defendant John Ward are dismissed. Plaintiff is entitled to his day in court on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul MetivaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morales v. BusbeeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Phat's Bar & Grill v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Long v. Board of Educ. of Jefferson County, Ky.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Ahlers v. SchebilDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Burleigh v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.