Legal Opinion

Rose v. Reinhart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1975No. 39674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stuart, District Judge.

The plaintiff, George P. Rose, brought suit against the defendants and others to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The case was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff against defendants, John S. Reinhart and the First National Bank of Bellevue, in the amount of $28,000. Upon the overruling of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the defendants perfected an appeal to this court.

Although there was considerable disputed evidence, uncontested evidence showing probable cause was that on July 28, 1969, the plaintiff issued a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Diers v. MallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bechel v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Brumbaugh v. Frontier Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kersenbrock v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Clausen v. Omaha Loan & Building Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bourke v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McKinney v. OkoyeNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. LedwithNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. SAND LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS, INC. v. SvobodaNebraska Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Leisy v. Lisco State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API