Simms v. Seaman
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBishop, J.
Attorneys take an oath to “do nothing dishonest . . . not knowingly allow anything dishonest to be done in court, and . . . inform the court of any dishonesty of which [they] have knowledge . . . .” General Statutes § 1-25. Because I cannot agree with the majority that lawyers should be absolutely immune, as a matter of law, from claims sounding in fraud, I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion which affirms the judgment in favor of the defendants Penny Q. Seaman, Susan A. Moch, Kenneth J. Bartschi, Brendon P. Levesque *675and Karen L. Dowd on the fraud claims alleged by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.