Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1989No. 88-94, 88-95PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Chief Justice.

In this case two witnesses were called before the jury with the court and prosecutor knowing beforehand that they would assert their Fifth Amendment right not to testify, and then the court instructed the jury to disregard the effect of their being called as witnesses.

Appellants Dale Burton Jones (Jones) and Ray Lamar Knox (Knox) were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit murder in the first degree in violation of W.S. 6-1-303 and 6-2-101. They each raise five essentially identical issues on appeal.

Jones inquires:

“1. Was reversible error committed by the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Prime v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Haselhuhn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ray Lamar Knox v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, AKA Duane Shillinger, and Wyoming Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Ray Knox v. The State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Knox v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API