Legal Opinion

Union Nat'l Bank of Wichita v. Schmitz

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1993No. 68,750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

This action was commenced by Union National Bank (UNB) against Clifford J. Schmitz (defendant) for the recovery of a deficiency judgment in the amount of $2,087.97. The trial court concluded that UNB’s sale of a repossessed vehicle was not commercially reasonable and denied it a deficiency judgment. UNB appeals from that decision. After careful review, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand with directions.

The original lawsuit was filed as a limited action, and the evidence offered by UNB to sustain its burden of proof was also limited. UNB called one witness, an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hall v. Owen County State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In Re Zsa Zsa LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. Prairie State Bank v. HoefgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. Westgate State Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Richard v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gillenwater v. Mid-American Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. SagmillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MathisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API