Legal Opinion
Huntley v. Timm
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1989No. Civ. No. 890017PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Thomas R. Huntley appeals from a district court judgment dismissing, on its merits, Huntley’s contest of Mike Timm’s election to the House of Representatives for the Fifth Legislative District in Minot. We affirm.
The facts of this case are undisputed. Huntley and Timm were candidates for the legislative seat during the November 8, 1988 election. The Ward County Canvassing Board determined that Timm had been elected by a three vote margin over Huntley. The State Canvassing Board and the Secretary of State ordered a recount which resulted in the Ward County Recount…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. ConradNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. SchallernNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Torkelson v. ByrneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Kuhn v. BeedeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993