Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hui Mu v. William Barr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2019No. 16-71292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HUI RAN MU, Nos. 16-71292 Petitioner, 16-73561 v. Agency No. A056-496-104 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. OPINION On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted May 14, 2019 Portland, Oregon Filed September 4, 2019 Before: N. Randy Smith, Paul J. Watford, and Ryan D. Nelson, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge N.R. Smith 2 MU V. BARR SUMMARY* Immigration Granting in part and denying in part Hui Ran Mu’s petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Immigration…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Lara-Torres v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waterkeeper Alliance v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Agustin Romero Garcia v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Alexander Minasian v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Dai v. JaddouDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Gloria Sevilla-Amaya v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API