Legal Opinion

Dai v. Jaddou

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 26, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01402Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HONGYU DAI, No. 2:23-cv-01402-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 15 Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For 18 the reasons below, the Court agrees that Plaintiff’s claims are barred by 8 U.S.C. 19 § 1252(b)(9) which precludes a federal district court from reviewing decisions related 20 to immigration removal proceedings. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is 21 GRANTED. 22…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Wolfe v. StrankmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Clayton Salter v. Quality Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API