Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. Chrysler Corporation
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 25, 1965No. 234PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Judge.
The fourth party defendant, Newark Construction Co., (hereinafter referred to as Newark) has moved for judgment on the pleadings as to the complaint filed against it by fourth party plaintiff, Mahoney-Troast Construction Co., (hereinafter referred to as Mahoney-Troast). That complaint is based on an indemnity clause in a contract between Mahoney-Troast, a general contractor and Newark, its subcontractor. Mahoney-Troast seeks reimbursement for counsel fees and other expenses incurred when Mahoney-Troast provided a defense to the tort claim brought by Hollingsworth, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Griffiths v. Henry Broderick, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Loftin v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Batson-Cook Co. v. Industrial Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Cozzi v. Owens Corning Fiber Glass Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. Interstate Amiesite CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- Powell v. Interstate Vendaway, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Tateosian v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.