Legal Opinion

Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1964No. 43,302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from the judgment and orders of the trial court overruling plaintiffs’ motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the findings or for their enlargement, and from all other orders of the court.

While the action was based on a certain writing, to be discussed later, for clarity we shall state briefly the salient facts.

The defendant corporation is a contractor for highway work and submitted bids for road construction at the intersection of interstate highway 235 with U. S. highway 54 in Sedgwick county.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dryden v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. In Re Estate of JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Palmer v. the Land & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Somerset Acres West Homes Ass'n v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cain v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. International Motor Rebuilding Co. v. United Motor Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Gibbs v. ErbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Callan v. BiermannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. State v. VandeveldeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API