Legal Opinion

MELO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1997No. ID 3313PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3313 In re Modesto Adalberto MELO-Pena, Respondent File A36 557 344 - Oakdale Decided February 20, 1997 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In bond proceedings under the Transition Period Custody Rules, the standards set forth in Matter of Drysdale,

20 I&N Dec. 815

(BIA 1994), apply to the determinations of whether the alien’s release pending deportation proceedings will pose a danger to the safety of per- sons or of property and whether he or she is likely to appear for any scheduled proceeding. (2) The “is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimm v. RosenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. NOBLEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  3. CHINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968
  4. Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. DRYSDALEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
  2. FUENTES-CAMPOSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
  3. KOTLIARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
  4. Ortega-Rangel v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. LETTMANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API