Williams v. Hartis

BRITT, Judge.

’ The first question presented by this appeal relates to the validity of the service of process on the male defendánt.

We think service of process on the male defendant in this-action is controlled by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4(j) .(l)a, which provides in pertinent part as follows:

- “ ‘ (j) Process — manner of service to exercise personal jurisdiction. — In any action commenced in a court, of this State having jurisdiction of the subject matter and grounds for personal jurisdiction as provided in G.S. 1-75.4, the manner of service of process shall be as follows:(1) Natural Person. — Except…