Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Kaiser Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1983No. 82-7314PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The Board seeks enforcement of its order finding that Kaiser Steel committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to let striking employees remove tools from its Napa, California plant. Because we do not consider Kaiser’s conduct “inherently destructive” of important employee rights, we deny enforcement of the Board’s order. FACTS
The facts are undisputed. Kaiser required machinists at its Napa plant to furnish their own tools. Except during strikes, it allowed its employees to remove their tools, and to take them home just before a strjke began.
In July 1980,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Portland Willamette Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Champ CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. Champ CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990