Legal Opinion
Brooks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 14, 2000No. 5D99-1779PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
762 So.2d 1011 (2000)
Robert BROOKS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D99-1779.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 14, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
Robert Brooks appeals from sentences imposed upon resentencing after he was found in violation of his probation. He argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. SavageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Bradley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- McCaskill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Bolden v. FL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Lovett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Schurman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Crosby v. BoldenSupreme Court of Florida · 2004