Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crosby v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 12, 2004No. SC03-137Published

1DissentWells, J.

I dissent from the discharge of jurisdiction because the issue raised was correctly certified as a question of great public importance and should be addressed as such. Furthermore, by discharging jurisdiction, the majority allows a decision to stand that reaches inconsistent holdings and I conclude should be quashed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Johnny Bolden was convicted of felonious possession of firearms, possession of a short-barreled shotgun, third-degree-felony aggravated assault, and second-degree-felony aggravated battery, in connection with an incident occurring on December 21, 1992.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Evans v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Mayes v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. State v. SavageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API