Legal Opinion

State v. Axford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1987No. C7-86-1904PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree for sexually abusing his granddaughter over an extended period of time. Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. l(h)(v) (1986). The court of appeals granted defendant a new trial on the ground that the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting evidence that defendant’s son, the victim’s father, was also sexually abusing the victim during part of the same time period. State v. Axford, 409 N.W.2d 893 (Minn.App.1987). We reverse the decision of the court of appeals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. FrisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. SchulzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API