Legal Opinion

Baird v. Goforth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action upon a promissory note executed by the defendant on or about November 25, 1922, payable to the Farmers Merchants Bank of Hunter, North Dakota, or order. The note is in the sum of $616 and bears interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date until paid. Subsequently the payee bank became insolvent and the plaintiff Baird was duly appointed receiver thereof. The note in suit came into his hands among the other assets of the bank. The defendant failed or refused to pay the note and the plaintiff instituted this action. The allegations of the complaint are in the usual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Bank v. MaierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Mead v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andersen v. ReslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Campbell v. BeatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Burt State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Zuber v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Campbell v. BeatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API