Legal Opinion

Licznerski v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 5, 1950No. 10053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

The facts in this case are set out fully in the opinions of the court below, 81 F.Supp. 837; 83 F.Supp. 453 and 85 F.Supp. 87, and we will repeat only those circumstances which we deem necessary for our decision.

Fannie J. Licznerski (Fannie) is the widow of John W.~ Licznerski (John), the insured soldier, and the mother and natural guardian of Arlene Janet Licznerski (Arlene), a minor and the only child of John and Fannie. John originally had designated Fannie as the beneficiary of the policy and Arlene as the contingent beneficiary. On May 29, 1944 he designated his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hannay v. EveSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Ewert v. BluejacketSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Helmholz v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  5. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Gugliotta v. Evans & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. United States v. LeverettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Metals Disintegrating Company, Inc. v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Hello Farms Licensing MI, LLC v. GR Vending MI, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API