Legal Opinion

Follmer v. Frommel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from- judgment on report of referee. Action by Charles C. Follmer against William M. Frommel and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant Frommel appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This action is brought against defendants as co-partners on a note purporting to be made by the firm, the defendant Frommel only defending. The plaintiff alleges the copartnership of the defendants, and that they, on or about September 29, 1890, duly made, executed, and delivered to the plaintiff the note in suit. The defendant Frommel, in his answer, interposed a general denial. On the trial it was shown that the note, which was executed by the defendant McKinstry, was given for lumber sold September 29, 1890. The partnership was formed on October 1, 1890. The defendant then offered to show…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. Butchers & Drovers' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Brewster v. . StrikerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Union National Bank of Rahway v. UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Hier v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walbridge v. SimonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
  2. In re the Rochester, Hornellsville & Lackawanna RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API