Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Mulligan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaikchild, J.

The strength of a tax deed depends upon whether all the requirements of law governing a sale of real property for taxes have been fully complied with. If any act required by law, such as a proper notice of the application for tax deed by a completed service thereof on the owner, is omitted, the tax deed is not valid. It has been recognized as a valid rule that statutes authorizing and regulating tax sales must be construed for the benefit of the owner. In Klug v. Soldner, 228 Wis. 348, 351, 280 N. W. 350, it was said: “The statute relating to notice should be construed liberally .in favor of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klug v. SoldnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Richland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. Kenneth JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Preston v. Iron CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Carroll v. Richland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Theige v. County of VernonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API