Legal Opinion

Escobedo v. Dynasty Insulation, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 3, 2010No. 2:08-mj-00137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge.

On this day, the Court considered Sergio Escobedo, et al.’s (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Dynasty Insulation, Inc.’s (“Dynasty”) respective cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Pis.’ Mot. for Partial Summ. J. (“Pis.’ Mot.”) (Doc. No. 64); Def.’s Mot. for Partial Summ. J. (“Def.’s Mot.”) (Doc. No. 65). In ruling upon these motions, the Court also considered Dynasty’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence (“Motion to Strike”) (Doc. No. 67). For reasons discussed below, Dynasty’s Motion to Strike is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ Motion is…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lee v. Metrocare ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Guerrero v. Total Renal Care, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Bass v. City of JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
  4. Ferguson v. Tex. Farm BureauDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
  5. Brooks v. The City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API