Legal Opinion
Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 12, 2005No. AC 24654PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The petitioner, John Vivo III, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying in part his petition for a wilt of habeas corpus. On appeal, he claims that (1) the court improperly concluded that he received effective assistance of counsel and (2) his sentence under General Statutes § 53-202k should be vacated. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the habeas court.
As noted by the court, the basic facts of this case are not in dispute. “On or about February 23, 1994, three males entered an apartment at the Evergreen Apartments in Bridgeport,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pierce v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Solek v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Small v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. SamuelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.