Legal Opinion

People v. Eisenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

A review of the record discloses there was sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of guilt with respect to the charge of obstructing an officer in the performance of his duty.

On appellate review, where there are conflicting inferences to be drawn from the proof, the choice of inferences is for the trier of the facts. We have limited jurisdiction to pass on the factual determination affirmed by the Appellate Term, unless unsupported, as a matter of law (People v. Leonti, 18 N Y 2d 384).

Appellant claims, however, that this case ‘1 presents an extraordinary state of the evidence, which raises…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. CalabriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. FlahertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. People v. BevilacquaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API