Legal Opinion

Whiteman v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2002No. 20010224Published

1Opinion of the Court

643 N.W.2d 704 (2002)

2002 ND 77

Ambrose Joel WHITEMAN, Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

No. 20010224.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 14, 2002.

Ambrose Joel Whiteman, pro se, Bismarck, ND, Submitted on brief.

Wade Lykken Webb, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee.

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ambrose Joel Whiteman appealed from a judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. We conclude Whiteman has raised a genuine issue of material fact whether his attorney was ineffective for failing to follow his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API