Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Chief Judge Desmond (concurring in part).
Although for reasons hereafter stated I would not void past-granted Chihuahua divorces, I emphatically reject the proposition that New York State must continue to recognize these one-day decrees awarded to our residents in manner and on theories repugnant to our basic ideas.
There is no justification in positive law, public policy, natural justice or morals for a validation by this court of the practice of some of the citizens of our State of going to Mexico for divorces of the sort attacked on these appeals. My vote against recognizing them for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Caldwell v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.