Legal Opinion · Dissent

Metzger v. Quick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1955No. 32905Published

1Dissent

Finley, J.,

(dissenting)-—-The facts are set out rather fully in the majority opinion. However, in this connection, I would point out the following:(a) The notices left by the treasurer at the millsite were not easily available .to public view, because they were posted inside of the building; and this may well have limited appellant’s opportunities to become apprised of the contemplated distraint and sale.(b) The treasurer’s letters received by appellant merely informed him that delinquent taxes could be collected without notice, “and if necessary [the treasurer] may forthwith distrain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Anstine v. McWilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Kimball v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. J. K. Lumber Co. v. AshWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Yakima Finance Corp. v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API