Legal Opinion

State v. Holland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1975No. 36040PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of rape (forcible) and sentenced to five years imprisonment. We affirm the judgment.

The issues presented involve testimony concerning a juvenile line-up, questions propounded to defendant on cross-examination, rebuttal testimony, and argument of counsel. Defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction.

The victim, a young woman, stopped at her office in downtown St. Louis on Sunday, March 25, 1973, to check a computer program she had run earlier in the week. She left the office building alone about 2:30 in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Switzer v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Kansas City v. HoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. ShumateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. KirkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. HurstMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. SiemsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API