Legal Opinion

In re Russell

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 31, 2013No. 13-50045PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN

JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

In her Chapter 13 plan, Erica Jane Russell proposes to pay a higher dividend to holders of cosigned consumer debts than to her other general unsecured creditors. The Chapter 13 trustee contends that this differential treatment unfairly discriminates against creditors holding debts that are not cosigned. But the Bankruptcy Code permits a Chapter 13 debtor’s plan to pay a higher dividend to creditors holding cosigned consumer debts than it pays to other…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. R. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. RLCSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aaron R. BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  2. Apryl Bernadette MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API