Legal Opinion

State v. Dye

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1985No. C3-84-2057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant James Dean Dye was convicted of burglary in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.582, subd. l(a)(c) (1984) and aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.245 (1984). On appeal he contends the evidence was insufficient for convictions. He disputes the admission of Spreigl evidence, line-up evidence, and the cross-examination of alibi witnesses. He also challenges denial of sanctions for an alleged discovery violation. Finally, he argues that a triple departure was not justified by substantial and compelling circumstances in this case. We affirm, but modify the sentence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BelkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. State v. NuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. GoyetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API