State v. Dye
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant James Dean Dye was convicted of burglary in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.582, subd. l(a)(c) (1984) and aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.245 (1984). On appeal he contends the evidence was insufficient for convictions. He disputes the admission of Spreigl evidence, line-up evidence, and the cross-examination of alibi witnesses. He also challenges denial of sanctions for an alleged discovery violation. Finally, he argues that a triple departure was not justified by substantial and compelling circumstances in this case. We affirm, but modify the sentence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BelkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. NuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. GoyetteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006