Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Meyer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1929No. Nos. 26,841, 26,842, 26,843, 26,844, 26,845, 26,846, 26,847, 26,848, 26,849, 26,850PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 223 N.W. 135. The city of Hastings appeals from a judgment annulling a reassessment of the cost of paving. The subject matter has been here before on appeal from a judgment sustaining the original assessment for the cost of the improvement. In re Appeal of Meyer, 158 Minn. 433, 197 N.W. 970, 199 N.W. 746. There was a reversal, and the original assessment annulled because of a jurisdictional defect of notice.
Hastings is a city of the fourth class, and the improvement was made pursuant to L. 1919, p. 62, c. 65, § 10 of which provides for a reassessment to cover the cost of an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rogers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- In re the Assessment of Benefits, Costs & ExpensesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Yager v. HeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- City of Owatonna v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1970