Legal Opinion

Wynn v. AC ROCHESTER

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1998No. 95-CV-6155LPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, James I. Wynn, Jr. (“plaintiff’), originally commenced this action in state court against his former employer, AC Rochester, General Motors Corporation (“AC Rochester”), and its personnel manager, Charles Volo (“Volo”) (collectively “defendants”), alleging fraud and misrepresentation. Believing that plaintiffs claims involved issues of federal law, under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, defendants removed the action to federal court. Pending before the Court now is plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint.

2Cases cited9 opinions

Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
Bennett A. Cohen v. Flushing Hospital and Medical Center, Local 1199 National Health and Human Service Employees Union, Dennis Rivera, and Gus MarinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
Ina King v. The New York Telephone Company, Inc., and the Telephone Traffic Union (New York)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
White v. White Rose FoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.